Alt text

Elitist Lies, Economic Suicide, and the War on the Working Class

The ruling class in Canada—led by so-called “progressive” politicians like Justin Trudeau—preaches endlessly about climate change, demanding sacrifice from the middle and working class while living in grotesque hypocrisy. They lecture ordinary people about reducing their carbon footprint while jet-setting around the world in private planes, vacationing in yachts, dining in luxury, and living in mansions that burn more energy in a week than most families use in a year. Their climate alarmism isn’t about saving the planet—it’s about controlling you, impoverishing you, and ensuring you stay in your place while they continue their privileged lifestyles untouched.

For years, the climate crisis has been framed as an urgent moral imperative, an existential threat so severe that it justifies stripping you of personal freedoms, taxing every aspect of your life, and reshaping the economy to align with an elite-approved “green” vision. But while the government forces you to pay carbon taxes on gas, groceries, and home heating, while they tell you to trade in your reliable second-hand vehicle for an unaffordable, government-mandated electric car, while they demand that you retrofit your home with solar panels and triple-pane windows you can’t afford, they themselves continue to live like kings, spewing carbon into the atmosphere at levels you could never dream of.

The Hypocrisy of The Climate Elite

The biggest climate polluters in Canada aren’t working-class truckers or suburban commuters—they’re the politicians and billionaire class who jet around the world lecturing the rest of us. Consider this:

  • Justin Trudeau’s flights alone have emitted over 2,800 metric tons of CO₂ since taking office—more than 200 times the emissions of the average Canadian in a year. He preaches about reducing our carbon footprint while his government-owned private aircraft shuttles him from climate summits to vacation getaways.
  • In just six months, Trudeau’s private and government flights logged over 127,000 kilometers, often for trivial domestic trips where alternative transport was available.
  • The Davos and COP Climate Summits—where elites gather to scold ordinary people for driving gas-powered cars—see hundreds of private jets land each year, emitting more carbon in a week than some small countries do annually.
  • The royal family, Hollywood celebrities, and billionaire philanthropists who demand “climate justice” routinely burn thousands of liters of jet fuel per trip. Leonardo DiCaprio, John Kerry, and other self-appointed climate warriors fly private to climate events while demanding the average Canadian give up their gas-powered vehicle.

This is not a serious climate policy—this is blatant hypocrisy and a war on the middle class.

Why the Climate Agenda Hurts the Poor the Most

The wealthiest nations are also the cleanest—not because they taxed their people into submission, but because they became rich enough to afford green technology. The simple truth—which climate alarmists refuse to admit—is that the fastest way to protect the environment is not through government-imposed scarcity, but through economic growth and technological innovation.

Just look at the actual data:

  • Wealthier nations have lower pollution levels because they can afford better infrastructure, cleaner energy, and waste management. Compare Canada to India or Nigeria, where pollution is rampant. The difference? Canada is wealthier, and wealth allows for sustainability.
  • Bjorn Lomborg, a rational environmental economist, has repeatedly shown that the best way to protect the environment is to lift people out of poverty first. If you’re struggling to survive, climate change is the last thing on your mind. People in extreme poverty aren’t buying Teslas—they’re just trying to find food and clean water.

When societies become rich enough, they naturally move toward cleaner energy, invest in better environmental protections, and reduce emissions without needing authoritarian control or regressive taxation. But what does our government do? Instead of focusing on making life affordable and increasing wealth, they punish the very people who need help the most.

The Carbon Tax Scam:

Carbon taxes disproportionately hurt the working class, raising heating bills, fuel prices, and food costs while the wealthy barely notice.

  • Trudeau’s carbon tax has increased the cost of living while doing virtually nothing to reduce global emissions, since countries like China and India continue expanding coal use.
  • Instead of encouraging innovation, the government forces compliance through punitive taxes and arbitrary regulations.

The Electric Vehicle (EV) Delusion:

  • The government wants everyone to drive EVs, but most working-class Canadians cannot afford a $60,000 Tesla.
  • Charging infrastructure is inconsistent, batteries degrade quickly, and replacement batteries cost upwards of $15,000-$20,000—a cost burden that falls on the consumer after just 8-10 years.
  • Meanwhile, Trudeau’s convoy continues using gas-guzzling SUVs while he insists the rest of us should drive a government-subsidized Nissan Leaf.

Forcing Homeowners to Retrofit Houses They Can’t Afford:

  • New “green” regulations require homeowners to upgrade insulation, replace gas furnaces with electric heat pumps, and install expensive energy-efficient windows—costs that most working Canadians simply cannot absorb.
  • Trudeau’s new home-energy efficiency policies will cost the average homeowner between $50,000-$100,000 in renovations over the next decade. Who has that kind of money lying around?

Carbon Tax Scam

The carbon tax in Canada is nothing more than a glorified scam, designed to punish working-class Canadians while lining government coffers under the false pretense of fighting climate change. The government rakes in billions from carbon pricing—$31 billion in 2021 alone—while emissions barely budge, proving that this is just another tax grab, not a serious environmental solution. They claim to “return” 90% of the money through rebates, but this only redistributes wealth inefficiently, making life more expensive while doing nothing to stop global polluters like China and India.

Meanwhile, businesses suffer, inflation rises, and Canada hemorrhages jobs—with projections estimating that the carbon tax could permanently wipe out 185,000 jobs by 2030. If the government actually cared about the climate, they would invest in nuclear energy, innovation, and technological advancements—not slap an arbitrary tax on every facet of life, forcing people to pay more to exist while Trudeau and his elitist friends fly private jets guilt-free. This is not a climate policy; it’s a regressive wealth transfer scheme that cripples the economy, exploits taxpayers, and does absolutely nothing to solve the global climate crisis.

The Manufactured “Climate Crisis” and the Ever-Changing Narrative

Have you noticed that climate alarmists keep moving the goalposts?

  • In the 1990s, they warned about “Global Warming.”
  • When it became inconvenient that some regions were getting colder, they changed the term to “Climate Change.”
  • When that wasn’t terrifying enough, they rebranded it again to a “Climate Emergency.”

These people change the narrative whenever reality fails to meet their doomsday predictions.

Yet, historical records show that the Earth’s climate has changed drastically for millions of years—long before industrialization, long before SUVs, long before carbon taxes.

  • The Younger Dryas Period (12,900 years ago) was significantly warmer than today—was that because of cavemen driving Ford F-150s?
  • The Medieval Warm Period (900-1300 AD) saw temperatures higher than today, long before fossil fuels.
  • The Sun is expanding, and one day, regardless of human intervention, it will boil Earth’s oceans.

Are we to believe that all climate changes throughout history were natural, but this one is purely man-made? That is an absurd and arrogant assumption.

Alt text

The Cult of Net Zero: A Delusional, Unachievable, Anti-Human Fantasy

The mind-numbing stupidity of the Net Zero agenda cannot be overstated. It is physically, scientifically, and economically impossible to achieve, yet the media, politicians, and corporate elites shove it down your throat as if it’s the only moral path forward. Newsflash: There is no such thing as “Net Zero” unless you eliminate all human activity entirely. Every single living creature emits carbon—you exhale CO₂ just by existing. Agriculture, transportation, industry—everything that sustains civilization produces emissions.

The idea that we can achieve absolute carbon neutrality is not just unrealistic, it is fundamentally anti-human, because the only way to truly reach Net Zero would be to stop human life altogether.

Yet, these same virtue-signaling elites keep parroting “Net Zero by 2050”, ignoring the reality that no country, no economy, and no civilization in history has ever functioned without carbon emissions. Even wind turbines and solar panels require fossil fuels to manufacture, transport, and install. Electric vehicles need rare earth mining that devastates the environment, and their batteries degrade within a decade, requiring more mining and waste disposal. Meanwhile, the same elites telling you to give up your gas-powered car continue flying private jets and expanding their energy-guzzling mansions without a second thought.

Chasing Net Zero is nothing more than a manipulative fear campaign designed to justify control, taxation, and economic suicide. It is a pipe dream for the ignorant, a weapon for the power-hungry, and a direct attack on prosperity, innovation, and human progress. Instead of blindly accepting this cultish nonsense, we should be focusing on making energy cleaner, more efficient, and more abundant—without crushing the economy or sacrificing human advancement.

Climate Alarmism: A Religion Masquerading as Science

This isn’t about science—it’s about power.

Climate change has become a secular religion for the global elite. They demand blind faith, shut down dissent, and punish those who refuse to comply.

But here’s the truth:

  • If the government truly cared about climate change, they would invest in nuclear power, expand hydroelectric infrastructure, and innovate cleaner solutions.
  • If the elites truly cared about the environment, they would stop flying private jets and living in palatial estates while demanding working-class people suffer under carbon taxes.
  • If politicians truly believed that we were facing an existential crisis, they would lead by example—not by punishing citizens while they themselves live in excess.

The elites don’t want that, because a strong and independent population cannot be controlled. Their climate agenda is a fraud, a scam, and a power grab designed to impoverish you while they live as kings. The only way to truly solve environmental challenges is to reject their manufactured crises, reject their carbon taxes, and fight for a Canada where economic prosperity and environmental responsibility go hand in hand—without authoritarian control.

Conclusion: The Path Forward is Prosperity, Not Poverty

The way to a greener, cleaner Canada is not through economic destruction, carbon taxes, or authoritarian policies that crush the working class. The best environmental policies are those that make a country richer, because wealthier nations can afford innovation, efficiency, and sustainability.

Smarter Climate Solutions: Balancing Economy and Environment

Instead of punishing citizens, we should focus on solutions that drive progress without heavy-handed mandates. Investing in affordable nuclear energy can provide stable, zero-emission power while encouraging entrepreneurial innovation fosters creative solutions to environmental challenges. Prioritizing economic growth, job creation, and higher wages ensures that people can naturally adopt cleaner technologies as they become more accessible and cost-effective.

1. Cost-Effective Policies Over Extreme Measures

  • Sweeping climate policies, like high carbon taxes or outright fossil fuel bans, will do more economic harm than environmental good. The key is efficiency—ensuring that policies provide more benefit than their cost, so resources aren’t wasted on ineffective solutions.

2. Economic Growth Leads to Cleaner Environments

  • Wealthier nations tend to adopt cleaner technologies naturally. By improving living standards, especially in developing countries, people are more likely to invest in sustainable energy and eco-friendly practices. Raising prosperity can be one of the fastest paths to long-term environmental progress.

3. Innovation Over Regulation

  • Rather than relying on strict carbon taxes or heavy mandates, investing in research and development for green technology—such as advanced nuclear energy, solar, battery storage, and carbon capture—can drive real change. The goal is to make clean energy so affordable and efficient that it outcompetes fossil fuels on its own, without excessive government intervention.

By focusing on innovation, economic expansion, and practical solutions, Canada can achieve real environmental progress without punishing its people.

Notable Fearmongering Examples

Below are some frequently cited examples of climate predictions or fear-driven narratives that never materialized as dramatically as advertised. These are cases where predictions or rhetoric strayed into hyperbole—or were simply dropped once reality didn’t match the hype.

1. Specific “Ice-Free Arctic” Deadlines That Came and Went

  • Al Gore’s 2007 Nobel Peace Prize Speech (and his documentary An Inconvenient Truth) referenced scenarios where Arctic sea ice could vanish by as early as 2013.
  • Several media outlets and public figures repeated claims that the Arctic would be “ice-free” in summer by around 2013–2015.

What actually happened?

While Arctic sea ice has generally declined over the long term, it did not disappear in any of those predicted timelines. Seasonal fluctuations continue, but there’s still a significant amount of summer ice in the Arctic every year.

2. “We Have Only 10 Years (or 12 Years, or 18 Months) to Save the Planet”

  • Over the past few decades, politicians and activists have repeatedly used short-term deadlines—10, 12, or even 18 months—to claim we are approaching an irreversible tipping point.
  • These hard deadlines often come and go, only to be replaced with new doomsday clocks.

What actually happened?

Emissions have indeed increased globally, but none of the “point of no return” deadlines triggered the catastrophic collapse predicted within those tight timeframes. The climate is still changing, but the sensationalized short-window predictions haven’t matched real-world outcomes.

3. 1970s Global Cooling Scares

  • In the 1970s, several headlines and some scientists discussed “global cooling” and the possibility of a coming ice age. Popular media outlets (e.g., Time and Newsweek) ran covers with dire warnings of a cooler planet.

What actually happened?

By the late 1980s and 1990s, focus had shifted to global warming instead. Some historians point out that the mainstream scientific consensus of the 1970s never fully embraced “global cooling” the way the media did, but it remains a go-to example of “big scare” headlines that didn’t pan out.

4. UN Statements Predicting Island Nations Would Vanish by 2000

  • In 1989, a UN Environment Program official famously warned that entire nations could be wiped off the map by rising sea levels if warming trends were not reversed by the year 2000.
  • Kiribati, the Maldives, and other island nations were cited as being on the brink of total inundation.

What actually happened?

Most of these island nations still exist in 2025. Some do experience coastal erosion and face legitimate long-term challenges, but the sweeping predictions of mass submergence by 2000 never came true.

5. “Snowfalls Are Now Just a Thing of the Past” (UK, Early 2000s)

  • Various British media outlets and certain academics claimed that by the 2010s, children in the UK might not know what snow is, owing to rapid warming.
  • The line was repeated to underscore the idea that mild winters would become the new norm.

What actually happened?

The UK continues to have variable winters; some have been relatively mild, others surprisingly snowy. There’s no indication that snow has disappeared or become a mere memory.

6. Elites Preaching Doom While Maintaining Coastal Mansions & Yachts

One of the big talking points about climate hypocrisy revolves around the wealthy who, despite dire climate predictions of massive sea-level rises, keep pouring investments into seaside real estate and luxury travel.

Former U.S. President Barack Obama purchased a multi-million-dollar estate on Martha’s Vineyard—a coastal property—after publicly urging action on climate change and sea-level rise. Billionaires and celebrities (e.g., Leonardo DiCaprio, John Kerry, etc.) fly private jets to climate conferences, maintain large yachts, and own multiple homes that require significant energy resources. If these individuals truly believed immediate, catastrophic sea-level rise was inevitable, critics argue they wouldn’t be heavily investing in properties allegedly at risk of inundation within a few years.

What actually happened?

Coastal real estate remains extremely valuable. Banks still offer 30-year mortgages on oceanfront properties in places that, according to the most alarming projections, should be under water soon. This discrepancy makes some people question how seriously the wealthy—or the financial sector—actually take the worst-case climate scenarios.

7. Predictions of Rapid Sea-Level Rise Putting Cities Underwater

Over the decades, numerous headlines have warned specific cities like New York, Miami, and Venice might be underwater by a particular year—often within a few decades. These predictions typically reference melting ice in Greenland or Antarctica leading to drastic sea-level rises.

What actually happened?

Sea levels are rising (roughly 3 mm per year globally, give or take), but not at the apocalyptic rates that would put major metropolitan areas underwater overnight. Cities do face issues like storm surges and erosion, but we haven’t seen a mass “exodus” from coastal areas. Real estate values along coastlines remain high, and developers keep building.

8. Alarmist Media Coverage of Individual Extreme Weather Events

  • After any major hurricane or heatwave, some headlines instantly label it as a definitive sign of accelerating climate collapse.
  • While there can be links between warmer temperatures and certain weather extremes, attributing every disaster solely to climate change (or describing it as unprecedented) can be misleading.

What actually happened?

Long-term data often show that while there may be trends toward more intense or frequent heatwaves, other types of events (e.g., some kinds of storms, droughts) don’t necessarily align perfectly with predictions of ever-increasing frequency. Moreover, improved technology and awareness mean we’re better at detecting and reporting events that previously went unrecorded.

As the late, great George Carlin once said, “The planet is fine. The people are fucked.” So if all else fails, at least we can watch his video, have a good laugh at our own expense, and then pretend our paper straws will magically fix everything.